Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
2.
Eur Respir J ; 2022 Sep 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2230782

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pathological evidence suggests that COVID-19 pulmonary infection involves both alveolar damage (causing shunt) and diffuse micro-vascular thrombus formation (causing alveolar dead space). We propose that measuring respiratory gas exchange enables detection and quantification of these abnormalities. We aimed to measure shunt and alveolar deadspace in moderate COVID-19 during acute illness and recovery. METHODS: We studied 30 patients (22 males, age: 49.9±13.5 years) 3-15 days from symptom onset and again during recovery, 55±10 days later (n=17). Arterial blood (breathing ambient air) was collected while exhaled O2 and CO2 concentrations were measured, yielding alveolar-arterial differences for each gas (AaPO2, aAPCO2) from which shunt and alveolar dead space were computed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: For acute COVID-19 patients, group mean (range) for AaPO2 was 41.4 (-3.5 to 69.3) mmHg; aAPCO2 was 6.0 (-2.3 to 13.4) mmHg. Both shunt (% cardiac output) at 10.4 (0 to 22.0)%, and alveolar dead space (% tidal volume) at 14.9 (0 to 32.3)% were elevated (normal: <5% and <10%, respectively), but not correlated (p=0.27). At recovery, shunt was 2.4 (0 to 6.1)% and alveolar dead space was 8.5 (0 to 22.4)% (both p<0.05 versus acute); shunt was marginally elevated for 2 patients, however, 5 (30%) had elevated alveolar dead space. CONCLUSIONS: We speculate impaired pulmonary gas exchange in early COVID-19 pneumonitis arises from two concurrent, independent and variable processes (alveolar filling and pulmonary vascular obstruction). For most patients these resolve within weeks, however, high alveolar dead space in ∼30% of recovered patients suggests persistent pulmonary vascular pathology.

4.
Intensive Care Med Exp ; 8(1): 10, 2020 Feb 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1453066

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Real-time bedside information on regional ventilation and perfusion during mechanical ventilation (MV) may help to elucidate the physiological and pathophysiological effects of MV settings in healthy and injured lungs. We aimed to study the effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and tidal volume (VT) on the distributions of regional ventilation and perfusion by electrical impedance tomography (EIT) in healthy and injured lungs. METHODS: One-hit acute lung injury model was established in 6 piglets by repeated lung lavages (injured group). Four ventilated piglets served as the control group. A randomized sequence of any possible combination of three VT (7, 10, and 15 ml/kg) and four levels of PEEP (5, 8, 10, and 12 cmH2O) was performed in all animals. Ventilation and perfusion distributions were computed by EIT within three regions-of-interest (ROIs): nondependent, middle, dependent. A mixed design with one between-subjects factor (group: intervention or control), and two within-subjects factors (PEEP and VT) was used, with a three-way mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: Two-way interactions between PEEP and group, and VT and group, were observed for the dependent ROI (p = 0.035 and 0.012, respectively), indicating that the increase in the dependent ROI ventilation was greater at higher PEEP and VT in the injured group than in the control group. A two-way interaction between PEEP and VT was observed for perfusion distribution in each ROI: nondependent (p = 0.030), middle (p = 0.006), and dependent (p = 0.001); no interaction was observed between injured and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: Large PEEP and VT levels were associated with greater pulmonary ventilation of the dependent lung region in experimental lung injury, whereas they affected pulmonary perfusion of all lung regions both in the control and in the experimental lung injury groups.

6.
Redox Biol ; 37: 101734, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-779587

ABSTRACT

The ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is a global public health emergency posing a high burden on nations' health care systems and economies. Despite the great effort put in the development of vaccines and specific treatments, no prophylaxis or effective therapeutics are currently available. Nitric oxide (NO) is a broad-spectrum antimicrobial and a potent vasodilator that has proved to be effective in reducing SARS-CoV replication and hypoxia in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. Given the potential of NO as treatment for SARS-CoV-2 infection, we have evaluated the in vitro antiviral effect of NO on SARS-CoV-2 replication. The NO-donor S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine (SNAP) had a dose dependent inhibitory effect on SARS-CoV-2 replication, while the non S-nitrosated NAP was not active, as expected. Although the viral replication was not completely abolished (at 200 µM and 400 µM), SNAP delayed or completely prevented the development of viral cytopathic effect in treated cells, and the observed protective effect correlated with the level of inhibition of the viral replication. The capacity of the NO released from SNAP to covalently bind and inhibit SARS-CoV-2 3CL recombinant protease in vitro was also tested. The observed reduction in SARS-CoV-2 protease activity was consistent with S-nitrosation of the enzyme active site cysteine.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Nitric Oxide Donors/pharmacology , S-Nitroso-N-Acetylpenicillamine/pharmacology , SARS-CoV-2/drug effects , Virus Replication/drug effects , Animals , Catalytic Domain/drug effects , Chlorocebus aethiops , Coronavirus 3C Proteases/antagonists & inhibitors , Coronavirus 3C Proteases/metabolism , Humans , Models, Molecular , Nitric Oxide/pharmacology , SARS-CoV-2/enzymology , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Vero Cells , Viral Protease Inhibitors/pharmacology
8.
Nitric Oxide ; 103: 1-3, 2020 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-611235

ABSTRACT

It has long been suggested that NO may inhibit an early stage in viral replication. Furthermore, in vitro tests have shown that NO inhibits the replication cycle of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Despite smoking being listed as a risk factor to contract Covid-19, only a low proportion of the smokers suffered from SARS-corona infection in China 2003, and from Covid-19 in China, Europe and the US. We hypothesize, that the intermittent bursts of high NO concentration in cigarette smoke may be a mechanism in protecting against the virus. Mainstream smoke from cigarettes contains NO at peak concentrations of between about 250 ppm and 1350 ppm in each puff as compared to medicinal use of no more than 80 to a maximum of 160 ppm. The diffusion of NO through the cell wall to reach the virus should be significantly more effective at the very high NO concentration in the smoke, according to classic laws of physics. The only oxide of nitrogen in the mainstream smoke is NO, and the NO2 concentration that is inhaled is very low or undetectable, and methemoglobin levels are lower in smokers than non-smokers, reasonably explained by the breaths of air in between the puffs that wash out the NO. Specialized iNO machines can now be developed to provide the drug intermittently in short bursts at high concentration dose, which would then provide both a preventative drug for those at high risk, as well as an effective treatment, without the health hazards associated with smoking.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/drug effects , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Nitric Oxide/pharmacology , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Protective Agents/pharmacology , Administration, Inhalation , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Nitric Oxide/administration & dosage , Protective Agents/administration & dosage , SARS-CoV-2 , Smokers , Smoking , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL